Your log should list the GC code and cache title of each of your qualifying caches.
CuteLilFuzzyMonkey and RetiredGuy have combined to put out the Retired Monkey Challenge Trail. In the tradition of challenge caches, at least one of the two of us has qualified for each challenge. Because we have very different caching styles, the challenges will be very tough for one person to complete all of them. Your progress will be tracked on the leaderboard. As with many good caches, our inspiration for many of these caches came from others, so thank you all!
For most of the caches in this series, we will provide a checker through Project GC to verify whether you have met the challenge. Often the script is written by others, so they might not word the results perfectly, but it will save a huge amount of time to check if you have met the challenge.
You can use the above link to check your progress.
Here is CuteLilFuzzyMonkey's positive response from the Project-GC Checker:
You have found 100 out of 50 required caches with the specified words in the name.
Here are your qualifying caches:
1: Heroes Memorial Park (GC18EAT) by kevlinf, found 2013-12-23
2: Wickham In The Park TB Resort & Hotel (GCNC3G) by tiki-4, found 2014-01-05
3: Parking Fee (GC1EK82) by xplorer7, found 2014-01-09
4: Park Here for a hike (GC4NGQR) by C.H.E.F., found 2014-01-11
5: Welcome to Fay Lake Wilderness Park (GC4WE5Q) by T-JAK, found 2014-01-28
Rules for the challenge caches in this series:
1) As with all caches, the decision as to whether a log is valid rests solely with the cache owner.
2) We have provided a verification tool whenever possible. It might not be perfect and is therefore not the final authority (see #1).
3) You may sign the log before completing the challenge. If you have do this, please use a "Write note" log to record your find and then a "Found it" log once you have completed the challenge.
4) Your log must contain enough information to prove you have met the challenge. We suggest using the verification checker if one is available. You do not always need to provide the entire output of the checker as it can sometimes be quite verbose.