EST: Me ei saa oodata looduselt armuande; temalt võtta on meie ülesanne, deklameerib lektor kinofilmis püüdlikult Ivan Mitšurini loosungeid. Kas Mitšurini nime kandnud kolhoos toimis samamoodi? Ja mis mees oli Aleksander Preemet, kes 1955ndal vahetas ENSV põllumajandusministri asetäitja ameti partei kutsel kolhoosiesimehe oma vastu? Kas tema ka nõudis? Kuidas klapib siia see, et Preemeti eestvõttel jagati siiakanti kolhoosnikele krunte, nii et „Enamus praeguse Peetri “külasüda” majadest on ehitatud 1960ndate lõpus – 1970 alguses, osad neist isegi varasemate taluhoonete vundamentide peale“? Miks pandi ühele kolhoosiesimehele mälestussammas – seda ei juhtunud ju mitte liiga sageli? Miks see sammas siiani püsib? Ja kuidas klapib see, mida sambamees praegu näeb, tema omaaegse arusaamaga? Ons armuannid sisse nõutud?
ENG: "We cannot wait for gifts from nature; to demand them is our task", declamates a lecturer in a Soviet movie the slogan by Ivan Michurin. Did the collective farm bearing his name act the same way? And what kind of a man was Aleksander Preemet, who in 1955 changed his position as a vice minister for agriculture of the Estonian SSR to become a chairman of a head of a collective farm? Did he also demand? How does it fit into the scheme that Preemet encouraged giving kolkhozniks plots to build their houses, so that the "current heart of the Peetri village consists of huses built during his reign" in 1960s-70s, some on foundations of pre-war farms? Why a monument was erected for a collective farm chairman - that did not happen that often - and why is it still standing there? How does the current view the man on the stone sees correspond to his old visions? Have the gifts been demanded in?