Skip to content

WAC-041 Traditional Cache

This cache has been archived.

Cache And Dash SC: Time to archive this series. Thanks for all the visits!

More
Hidden : 4/29/2009
Difficulty:
2 out of 5
Terrain:
1.5 out of 5

Size: Size:   small (small)

Join now to view geocache location details. It's free!

Watch

How Geocaching Works

Please note Use of geocaching.com services is subject to the terms and conditions in our disclaimer.

Geocache Description:

This series of caches will detail portions of the State's Ocean Water Quality Monitoring and Notification program. This beach site is sample location 'WAC-041' in the program and this cache details the Tier classifaction system and actual process for sampling:

RISK-BASED BEACH EVALUATION AND CLASSIFICATION

Beaches in South Carolina are ranked based on available information concerning intensity of beach use, potential risk to public health, and other applicable factors. A three-tier system was used for this process, with Tier I being the highest priority:

Tier I site – storm water outfall or swash and high beach-goer activity. (all sites in Horry County)
Tier II site - heavy beach-goer activity but no direct storm water outfall (all sites south of Horry County)
Tier III site - low to no beach-goer activity but someone 'might' swim here as it has patron access (mostly marinas and boat launches, or places only accessable by boat)

Intensity of beach use was based on accessibility of the beach, available governmental data, and observations of actual use. Accessibility encompassed factors such as public or private beach, number of access points, amount of available parking, and if accessible by foot or by boat only.

Potential Risk to Public Health

For those beaches previously monitored, risk was assessed based on the presence of known pollution sources and the number of advisories and total beach-mile-days of advisories in the 2002 swim season. For those beaches and points of access not previously monitored, risk was inferred based on several factors. These factors included water body classification, potential for point and non-point source pollution, historic water quality of similar areas, type of use (likelihood of ingesting water), and susceptibility of user population.

Other Factors:

Other factors considered in establishing beach priorities were the importance to the local economy and tourism industry, public opinion, and public input. South Carolina’s Atlantic Ocean coastline is a well-known feature of the State drawing millions of visitors annually and boosting local economy. Due to these factors, oceanfront beaches were given priority in the ranking scheme.

MONITORING PLAN

The objective of South Carolina’s beach monitoring program is to protect public health through the issuance of advisories based on accurate, representative sampling. This sampling design and monitoring implementation plan has been developed to describe the frequency and location of monitoring and assessment of South Carolina’s coastal recreation waters.

A study to determine levels of bacteria in the surf of South Carolina beaches under varying site and environmental conditions was conducted with ten local governments in 1997. One sampling site was selected for each two to three miles of beach, and one each at the furthest reaches of accessible beach within each participant’s jurisdiction. In areas with swashes or storm water discharges to the beach, sites at their confluence with the ocean, and 100 feet on either side, were selected. At a minimum, the two sites with the highest estimated storm flows in each municipality or jurisdiction were included. Samples were collected in dry weather at high and low tide and in wet weather at high and low tide. “Dry” weather meant that three or more days had passed since the last rain. “Wet” weather samples were collected within three hours of the first rain of 0.1 inches or more, following a dry period. Over 1,400 surf and storm water samples were collected during this study. Major finding of the study were:

In areas with no storm water outlets or swashes, the average concentration did not exceed EPA guidelines and all individual sample results were less than State safe swimming limits, regardless of weather conditions.

Beaches with discharges from swashes and/or storm water outlets showed variability based on weather. Dry weather samples from these areas did not exceed the EPA recommended average. Wet weather effects on surf bacteria varied from site to site and with rainfall amount; results from many samples exceeded the single-sample limit. In general, highest single-sample concentrations were associated with rainfall amounts greater than one inch.

Routine monitoring of beaches from 1998 through present has validated the previous points and has added to our understanding of beachfront water quality dynamics. This monitoring has shown that beaches with associated storm water runoff (Tier I beaches) have the highest counts in the period three hours before to three hours following low tides.

SAMPLING PROCEDURE

Samples are taken weekly at Tier I sites and every other week at Tier II sites. A 100ml sample is taken at knee depth (to simulate a child playing in the surf) and put on ice. This is done so that any bacteria concentrations are 'fixed' and will help prevent further growth as well as allow for a6 hour holding time on samples before they must be processed.

Once back at the lab, the a 10 ml sample is pulled from the main sample for each site and diluted with 90ml of regular water to create a 10:1 concentration. This is put in a sealable pouch with a special food that encourages bacteria growth. The special food also has an effect of causing the individual colonies to flouresce, or glow, under a black light. After 24 hours in an incubator at 103F, the samples are removed and passed under the blacklight to assess actual concentrations. Where there is a glow, you have a colony. Count the colonies and multiple by 10 and you have a concentration for the sample you took yesterday.

A more rapid method of detection (2 hours) is currently being developed by scientists with monies from EPA grants and works great in fresh water beaches (like those on the Great Lakes) but has been found to be exceedingly inaccurate when used in salt water environments. So for now, 24 hours is the best method available.

Info about the cache series: Each cache in the "WAC" series will have items pertaining to the State's "Stay Well in the Water" program or in the case of WAC-034, items from the Town of Surfside. Feel free to take one from each cache and I'll try to keep them all stocked with different items. Also, each cacher that logs finds at all four caches in the series will get a special "Stay Well in the Water" totebag! (One per family of cachers, please). Check out all four, learn the background and facts and become educated so you can help educate others!

For further information check out the rest of the caches in the series:

WAC-004: Program Overview
WAC-019: Permanent Signs and Advisories
WAC-034: Math Modeling and Future Projects

Additional Hints (Decrypt)

Fnaqjvpu pbagnvare

Decryption Key

A|B|C|D|E|F|G|H|I|J|K|L|M
-------------------------
N|O|P|Q|R|S|T|U|V|W|X|Y|Z

(letter above equals below, and vice versa)