Skip to content

Hjulstrom Curve - The Power of Water EarthCache

Hidden : 10/27/2011
Difficulty:
3.5 out of 5
Terrain:
2 out of 5

Size: Size:   not chosen (not chosen)

Join now to view geocache location details. It's free!

Watch

How Geocaching Works

Please note Use of geocaching.com services is subject to the terms and conditions in our disclaimer.

Geocache Description:


For starters you won’t be able to do the earthcache observations if the Little Miami river level is too high. Check here for the river level. Little Miami River Level

The river was at 5.5 feet when I made my observations. If the water is a few feet higher and the GZ will be under water and you won’t be able to take your measurements. You should be standing in the middle of the rock “beach” on the shore of the Little Miami River. Note for paperless cachers – this might be one cache worth printing out to help with the field work.

There is no need to bushwhack. There is a well-defined trail in Avoca park that starts at N 39° 08.343 W 084° 20.478 Parking is near there too. This is why I selected this spot – easy access!

Where you are standing is a point bar of a river meander or a sharp bend in the river. For more info on how meanders are formed and their features visit GC36NKM. Both this “beach” of rock and the deeply eroded bank on the opposite side were formed by the two processes that shape river geography, erosion and sedimentation. What we are going to do at this spot is to quantify the driving force of erosion: the velocity of the water!

When the river is at flood stage, very fast moving water scrubs the point bar you are standing on. Note the uniformity of the rocks at this spot. They are all scrubbed white – no algae, no dirt on the rocks. They are almost entirely composed of rocks that have sides eroded round by the erosive power of the water. They also almost have a distinctive shape: mostly flat. It is the fast flowing flood water that basically “sorts” these rocks, leaving these here on the bank while washing others downstream or left deeper in the channel bed. The flow also scrubs off the dirt and smaller particles like sand off this area. The only smaller rocks you see might be lodged under some of the larger ones.

Henning Filip Hjulstrom was a Swedish geographer who started quantifying the processes that form features like this point bar. Below is a notional version of the diagram he and his students later developed to quantify erosion and deposition of river materials.

This is a graph that shows the relationship between the size of sediment and the velocity required to erode (lift it), transport it and deposit it. The critical erosion curve shows the MINIMUM velocity required to lift a particle of a certain size. The mean fall or “settling” deposition curve shows the MAXIMUM velocity at which a river can be flowing before a particle of a certain size is deposited. The zone in-between is the zone of transport. Note the velocities for transport are lower than that for erosion, because it takes much more energy to lift sediment and start its motion than to maintain it in transport. Note that the graph is logarithmic, not linear. On this scale you can see that from 1mm to 100mm the “transportation” velocity, or the velocity that a particle will be moved, is linear relative to particle size. But below 1mm the relation between particle diameter and velocity is not as well correlated.

This curve shape is due to the fact that there are two different regimes covered by the graph. For particle sizes where friction is the dominating force preventing erosion (1-100mm) the graph is linear. But for cohesive material like clay and silt, the erosion velocity increases with decreasing grain size, as the cohesive forces (electrostatic) are relatively more important. Note the consistency of the material under/between the rocks – thick clay and mud.

Estimating River Velocity

We are going to use the graph below to estimate the water velocity scrubbing this point bar. From where you are standing try to find the smallest rock that is on the top layer. We’ll assume the water current was fast enough to wash away anything smaller. The motion of rocks along the bottom of a river is called “bed load”. The curve lists “diameter” and assumes spherically shaped objects (sand perhaps), but the rocks at the GZ are more ellipsoid in shape – like the diagram below. So we’ll come up with an equivalent diameter.

For you paperless earthcachers, I’ll try to describe the dimensioning. Almost all the rocks you’ll see around you are relatively flat on one side with an oval shaped face. Dimension “C” is the thinnest dimension between the 2 flat faces. If you look at the oval face of the rock “A” is the longest dimension and “B” is the direction perpendicular to “A”. (If you printed out the cache listing there’s a scale at the bottom.). Measure B and C. (If you don’t have a scale and didn’t print this out you could take a photo next to your GPS to scale it on the computer screen.)

We’ll assume the rocks tend to line themselves up with the water flow such that water flows along the “A” dimension. Then the “B” and “C” dimensions set the ellipse shaped cross section of the rock. The chart lists velocities based on diameter so we’ll estimate the equivalent diameter based on cross sectional area. The circular cross sectional area of a sphere is where D is the diameter = Π[pi]x(D)(D)/4 for our ellipse it is Π[pi] x(B)(C). So measuring the dimensions B and C for the rock - use the following to calculate the equivalent diameter for the chart.

 (4)(B)(C) 

[Again for you paperless cachers that’s square root of the product 4xBxC.]

With this “effective” diameter you can go into the detailed Hjulstrom curve and pick off the velocity of the water that it would take to move it. Remember it’s a log/log curve.

Now we’ll add one last scientific detail to our calculation. We’ll also assume the coefficient of drag of the flat rock (an ellipsoid) is one half that of a sphere (per http://www.alepuniv.edu.sy/ev/uploaded_files/elibrary/files/file_667_828122.pdf) so the water velocity to move an ellipsoid rock is twice what you got from the curve. From that, you know that the velocity of the water there is a little less, but not much less or smaller rocks would be present.

To see a neat video of bed load transport - see the YouTube video below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3llzwvv1zc

To log this earthcache email me the answers to the following: (Show your math!)

1) What are the dimensions of your rock (B and C)?

2) What is it’s equivalent diameter?

3) Which of the two curves on the Hjulstrom diagram do you use to determine the velocity

required to start the motion of your rock that is at rest (this is the curve to use to answer #4)?

4) What water velocity would it take to move your rock? (You can convert to mile per hour using 1 centimeter/second = 0.022 369 362 921 mile/hour (mph))

5) The curve provided is for a water depth of 1 meter. Check out the river bank. The wall of dirt marks the “bank full” height of the river. When the river rises above this the water spills out onto the vegetated flood plain above. So is the curve applicable here?

6) Based on the charts how is your rock classified? (pebble, cobble, etc) Use the sizing on the diagram not the ruler.

7) Optional: post a picture of yourself and your rock to commemorate your visit!

Scale:

Additional Hints (No hints available.)